On Apr 13, 8:16 pm, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 13, 1:33 pm, Jesse McGrew <[email protected]> wrote:> On Apr 12, 11:35 > pm, Mariano Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Jesse, > > > the name Google is much more valuable then some of your better implemented > > > features. > > > Then I guess I'll just have to implement even more features to set my > > product apart. > > Then right on, prove your point. Try Map Editor or any of the other > apps in question. When you can show how you beat out the Google label > on your own terms AND make a living from it, I will be your biggest > supporter here, taking out all stops.
"AND"? I would think either one is fine. If you can make a living from the app, then you've clearly "beaten" Google in the minds of your customers. I am not very concerned with whether or not developers can make a living from any particular app. All that matters is whether the app exists and meets end users' needs, no matter whether it's commercial, freeware, or open source. As long as the app is out there for people to use, who cares if anyone is making money from it? Jesse --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
