Unbelievable really, but shows what all devs are having to put up with on the market.
I guess all I can say is focus on the sensible feedback and remember you are only charging a dollar and it is the consumer's choice whether to buy or not. They even have a guaranteed 24 hour return policy which we know works, so they should hardly be complaining. Its a weird psychology thing going on - if people know an app was free, could be free or in their mind should be free (not sure what this is based on), the dev has not right to put a price on all their hard work. On iPhone, apps are being driven down in price to $1. What we don't want to see on Android is apps being driven down to free. Otherwise there will be no incentives for devs, app quality will drop and the platform will ultimately suffer and then everyone will be forced to get iPhones and pay $1 for their apps anyway! Consumers beware ... On May 21, 9:15 am, Mariano Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > Very, very sad. > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:55 AM, CB <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "If you kept the app free and functional, you might have had some > > credibility in the marketplace. Now you are just another deceiver out > > for fast cash" > > > "Tired of being nickled and dimed" > > > "Great app but developer needs a lesson in marketing strategy. There > > are better ways of going about gettin a buck for your app. Think > > outside the box." > > > at least some people have sense : "Cheapskates: The devs ARE NOT on a > > noble quest to provide free apps. Grow up. Plus this Lite version is > > BETTER than the prev free version anyway!!" > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
