The Market is still young and the whole Android system is more OpenSource than Appel, so your business model should be more OpenSource oriented (Free to use pai for service)!
On 16 jun, 22:07, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: > To this day, I still believe it's the customers. They are much > cheaper, complaining constantly about having to pay anything for an > application and rating poorly consequently. > > In addition, there are waay too many free applications due to the free > nature of the Market initially that no one is willing to pay for a > quality app. > > Lastly as more phones come out at the end of this year, the sales > should double or quadruple. It's hard to make a mark on the iphone > due to the large amount of applications available. It's easier to > make a name on Android and wait for the sales to increase over time. > I will call Android development more of an investment. > > On Jun 16, 9:57 am, JP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Of course there's an engineering effort on the side of carriers and > > manufacturers to get them going with Android. And there's, for lack of > > a better term, a cottage industry all the way down to eBay making c25 > > on extra pics for auctions of devices that run Android. My point here > > is that *app* users are going through the Market that has the big name > > behind it, while a seeingly increasing number of devs are looking > > around, wondering if they're on the right bus here. > > > On Jun 16, 6:04 am, "Mark Murphy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You have a disturbingly narrow view of the Android ecosystem. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
