*"*Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code" (etc for other methods of distribution)
"Corresponding" is an important word. On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Sean Hodges <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Disconnect <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The good news is, if thats true it is a simple > > matter for someone (JBQ?) to create the necessary tags. (A lesser > violation > > than no code at all, but still an issue -- the ACTUAL sources need to be > > available, not "its in there somewhere, good luck".) > > Just like you, I'm keen to ensure that the required source code is > available, and Android continues to move towards being an open > platform... > > But I don't think the comment above is correct. The only licence I am > aware of that requires that each modified release is "marked as > changed" in the source is the GPLv3, and I'm fairly sure none of the > Android source is covered by this licence. If this is correct, then > providing tags in the Android VCS is a courtesy rather than a > requirement. > > Still, it would a nice commitment to the community if these tags were > kept up-to-date. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<android-discuss%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. > > > >--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
