If you're not going to follow the well established procedures then you can't complain when your ideas don't get taken up.
Seriously though, I may you trying to be ironic, but did you really expect everyone including the OHA to change their procedures just because you've decided you prefer forums to b.android.com? Being part of a community means that things aren't always done the way you want them. There are things I don't like about the way Android is developed and deployed, and I highlight them, but I can accept there may be other factors influencing the choice of process that may be necessary for other reasons (e.g. to ensure OEM uptake). Al. -- * Looking for Android Apps? - Try http://andappstore.com/ * ====== Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company number 6741909. The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's subsidiaries. On 29 Jan 2010, at 23:54, Matt Kanninen wrote: > No. It's not my job to put bugs into b.android.com. They can pay an > QA engineer to read the forums. > > On Jan 28, 10:56 pm, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm still holding out for Bluetooth DUN support so I can get live traffic >> info on my Tom Tom :). >> As a though, wouldn't it be better if we used b.android.com to capture this >> stuff?, that way we can easily refer to it in the future and others can vote >> up popular ideas. >> Al.-- >> >> >> * Looking for Android Apps? - Tryhttp://andappstore.com/* >> >> >> >> ====== >> >> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company >> number 6741909. >> >> >> >> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not >> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's >> subsidiaries.On 28 Jan 2010, at 19:56, Thomas Riley wrote:I'd quite like a >> Push Notification API, similar to the one they pulled >> for the 1.0 SDK. >> Multi-tasking + XMPP API = Epic :-) >> On Jan 28, 7:20 pm, Matt Kanninen <[email protected]> wrote:I know some >> things I want. I'd like a better NDK. I'd like betterWindows support for >> NDK developers.Ship Cygwin with it if you have to.I'd like Android 3.0's >> bionic to be way too strong to run on a G1. I'dlike it to be a lot closer to >> standard Linux, just still better.I'd like it if my private static variables >> didn't unexpectedly becomenull.I'd also like for Google to respond, >> officially, to yesterday. I'dlike for us, the AOSP developer community to >> stay ahead of the curve.And I want a good Android netbook, with a standard >> but large screensize, that can run games written for PCs in 1998.What do you >> all want? Which way do you think we should steer Android? >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Android Discuss" group. >> To post to this group, send email [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
