. typical micro$oft proprietary heck? just because they sold a license for a codec doesn't mean they explained completely how to build a robust implementation of it . (just guessing)
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Chih-Wei <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable. > But could you explain why Nexus One > can or cannot play some WMA files? > > On 4月7日, 下午6時47分, "Mark Murphy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've tried some WMA music files on my Nexus One. > > > Some are playable, but some are not. > > > (all are playable on a PC, of course) > > > > > Could someone confirm whether > > > Android 2.1 support WMA files or not? > > > > "Android 2.1" does not. Android is an open source OS; WMA is a > proprietary > > codec. I would imagine it violates Microsoft licenses to distribute an > > open source WMA codec. > > > > Some device manufacturers have licensed Windows Media codecs for Android > > and include them on their devices. So, some devices will be able to play > > WMA files, others will not. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<android-discuss%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. > > -- Americium Dream Documents "(real opportunity starts with real documentation) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
