The first thing I thought when I heard their approach was, "How very Apple." Giving you a list of the things that you are permitted to do in the background, and by the sound of it, the OS basically does them for you.
I still prefer Android, where basically anything is possible. If you have a good idea for a background process that ISN'T one of Apple's blessed seven, which platform leaves that door open for you? String On Apr 8, 8:18 pm, CB <[email protected]> wrote: > Apple just announced features for their upcoming iPhone 4.0 (http:// > news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20002049-37.html) > > Core features (tentpoles): Multitasking, Folders, Email, Enterprise > and iAd > > Overall, I'm quite impressed by the multitasking especially. I've > always thought that Android is a little too desktop-y in how it > handles background processes. The seven uses for multitasking > definitely seem reasonable without the slowdown & battery issues. > > What do you think? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
