On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Mike Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > If developers don't have a feature road-map, or some reply from the > dev team, they're very likely to jump ship (platform?).
Do any other commercially-viable smartphone platforms offer what you are seeking: a public issue tracker with popular issues tending to get replies from the platform vendor? If so, cite 'em! I'd be interested to see how they're handling it. If not, Android is no worse on this score than the competition. Ideally, they'd be better than the competition, but in this area, I'd settle for them being on par, personally. I'd describe iOS, Blackberry, WebOS (sorta), and Windows Phone as being "commercially-viable smartphone platforms", given Nokia's recent maneuvers. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android Training in Oslo: http://bit.ly/fjBo24 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
