If you go to the verdict: http://www.scribd.com/doc/92724336/12-05-07-Oracle-Google-Partial-Jury-Verdict-on-Copyright
it seems that only the rangeCheck method of some API is in violation (and, to the original point, it doesn't say anything about the fair use). On Monday, May 7, 2012 3:12:53 PM UTC-4, jtoolsdev wrote: > > I heard a few minutes ago that the jury had decided against Google on > copyright infringement in the Oracle vs Google case but couldn't decide > on fair use. I think this is going to raise the issue of our ridiculous > copyright laws to the forefront. For one thing I have a hard time with > the idea of a company which acquired Java two years after Google > acquired Android suing for infringement. Unfortunately with publicly > held companies execs feel they better sue because the stockholders will > scream otherwise and demand their resignation. It is one part of > capitalism that really sucks. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/android-discuss/-/5y4y6RyjM5MJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
