> And isn't that law just that one of the parties is aware the call is being > recorded? Presumably the person installing the app would be aware of what > they are doing with it.
It varies from state to state however a disclaimer would be fine rather than needing root and a new kernel to get an optimum recording without external hardware. I guess Google gets so much bother about privacy that they just steered clear. I'm surprised cyanogen sat on the fence for so long though. Does it record directly and what hardware does it support? -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) _______________________________________________________________________ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
