No need to sync a full tree.

Based on my latest status, once you have a tree that you have synced:

repo download platform/frameworks/base 9356/4
rm -rf out/
BUILD_WITHOUT_PV=true make

JBQ

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:34 PM, John Cola <jt...@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> How about delete whole tree and repo sync all over again?
> Can I make succes after dowloading the brand new master open source
> based on today's distribution?
>
> BR
> John
>
> On Mar 22, 2:50 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
>> I've been working on a "better" batch of patches (now it feels more
>> like open-heart surgery with a meat cleaver):
>>
>> -no need to delete the opencore directory or to remove it from the manifest.
>>
>> -you need to repo download changes 9355, 9356 and 9357. No need to
>> take 9300. I know it's 3 changes instead of 1, because I had to touch
>> a few more parts of the system, but those are much cleaner.
>>
>> -only tested on the emulator, so those might very well cause
>> regressions on dream.
>>
>> JBQ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> 
>> wrote:
>> > I've put together a hack that allows the system to compile and start
>> > all the way to the home app. I worked with the delicateness of
>> > open-heart surgery performed with a chainsaw.
>>
>> > Steps:
>>
>> > -remove the opencore files ( rm -rf external/opencore
>> > .repo/projects/external/opencore.git ). Remove opencore from your
>> > .repo/manifest.xml if you intend to repo sync the entire world but
>> > don't want to have to remove opencore every single time.
>>
>> > -patch in change 9300 ( repo download platform/frameworks/base 9300/1 )
>>
>> > -most probably do a clean build ( rm -rf out/ ; make )
>>
>> > I've "tested" on a device/release/generic/userdebug build. On my
>> > machine, it compiles, launches. The media process dies (which probably
>> > means that downloads are busted too), as well as the music player. The
>> > browser starts and can access the network.
>>
>> > JBQ
>>
>> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> 
>> > wrote:
>> >> I've submitted the merge (106 projects!), and I believe that the tree
>> >> is in the state that it should be.
>>
>> >> Caveats:
>>
>> >> -THE BUILD IS BROKEN. You've been warned. There's been some drift
>> >> around OpenCORE (probably situations where new code was written in
>> >> cupcake that uses OpenCORE 1, or where APIs were removed in cupcake
>> >> that OpenCORE 2 relies on).
>>
>> >> The proper command to try to merge the OpenCORE code should be "git
>> >> merge remotes/korg/cupcake" (I'm typing from memory).
>>
>> >> -I'm not 100% sure that the server contains exactly what it should.
>> >> I've had a filesystem failure right as I was trying to verify it, and
>> >> I'm not gonna be able to verify until at least sometime tomorrow.
>>
>> >> JBQ
>>
>> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> I expect to start submitting the changes in about an hour, i.e.
>> >>> between 1:30pm and 2pm PDT.
>>
>> >>> Starting right now, you may want to avoid initiating a new repo sync,
>> >>> unless you're OK ending up with a tree that might not even compile.
>>
>> >>> JBQ
>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> [bcc android-platform, android-framework, android-porting]
>>
>> >>>> I'm working on merging the latest cupcake code drop into master. The
>> >>>> task is quite hairy, so the following two guidelines probably apply:
>>
>> >>>> -please don't submit anything in gerrit, as you'll just get in my way.
>> >>>> -now is a good time to repo sync master, as I'm going to have to
>> >>>> submit the result of the merge in a state where it doesn't build, and
>> >>>> I have no idea how long it'll take to get it to build again after
>> >>>> that.
>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> JBQ
>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
>> >>>> Android Engineer, Google.
>>
>> >>>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> >>>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> >>>> warning.
>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
>> >>> Android Engineer, Google.
>>
>> >>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> >>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> >>> warning.
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
>> >> Android Engineer, Google.
>>
>> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> >> warning.
>>
>> > --
>> > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
>> > Android Engineer, Google.
>>
>> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> > warning.
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
>> Android Engineer, Google.
>>
>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
>> warning.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> >
>



-- 
Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
Android Engineer, Google.

Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
warning.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"android-framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-framework@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
android-framework+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to