Thanks JBQ. Got around it.

-Ravi

On Mar 31, 4:55 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> Yes, I think it's broken, both on cupcake and master. My understand is
> that vold (the volume-management daemon, which replaced mountd) is
> looking for a file that is not installed by the default configuration.
>
> I've filedhttp://b.android.com/2335
>
> JBQ
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:38 AM, rktb <yend...@pv.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Is there an issue with the "sdcard" not being recognized on "master"
> > latest? From the log also, I see the mediascanner service scan only
> > the "internal" directory. I don't see the "external" directory.
>
> > yend...@yendurid630:~/oha_android$ grep MediaScanner /tmp/loge.txt
> > 03-31 03:12:09.977   579   579 I ActivityManager: Start proc
> > android.process.media for broadcast
> > com.android.providers.media/.MediaScannerReceiver: pid=688 uid=10005
> > gids={1006, 2001, 3003}
> > 03-31 03:12:12.226   688   697 D MediaScannerService: start scanning
> > volume internal
> > 03-31 03:12:03.726   688   697 D MediaScanner: opendir /system/media/
> > failed, errno: 2
> > 03-31 03:12:03.726   688   697 D MediaScanner:  prescan time: 240ms
> > 03-31 03:12:03.736   688   697 D MediaScanner:     scan time: 44ms
> > 03-31 03:12:03.746   688   697 D MediaScanner: postscan time: 1ms
> > 03-31 03:12:03.756   688   697 D MediaScanner:    total time: 285ms
> > 03-31 03:12:03.786   688   697 D MediaScannerService: done scanning
> > volume internal
> > 03-31 03:12:03.796   579   583 I ActivityManager: Stopping service:
> > com.android.providers.media/.MediaScannerService
>
> > -Ravi
>
> > On Mar 30, 5:26 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote:
> >> [still bcc android-platform, android-framework, android-porting]
>
> >> Final status on this:
>
> >> -BUILD_WITHOUT_PV=true is now the default in master, so that a plain
> >> "make" should work again. This is still only a temporary hack and
> >> we'll have to fix this the right way in the future, but it'll let
> >> people build "out of the box".
>
> >> -Sorry for the delay in getting this done. Everything has been hectic.
>
> >> JBQ
>
> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > [still bcc android-platform, android-framework, android-porting]
>
> >> > Latest status:
>
> >> > -we're back to one patch: 9356.
>
> >> > -build with "BUILD_WITHOUT_PV=true make"
>
> >> > -quickly tested both on emulator and dream, and seems to work well
> >> > enough to not have the phone app crash in a loop.
>
> >> > -I expect to submit 9356 on Monday morning PDT.
>
> >> > JBQ
>
> >> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> I've been working on a "better" batch of patches (now it feels more
> >> >> like open-heart surgery with a meat cleaver):
>
> >> >> -no need to delete the opencore directory or to remove it from the 
> >> >> manifest.
>
> >> >> -you need to repo download changes 9355, 9356 and 9357. No need to
> >> >> take 9300. I know it's 3 changes instead of 1, because I had to touch
> >> >> a few more parts of the system, but those are much cleaner.
>
> >> >> -only tested on the emulator, so those might very well cause
> >> >> regressions on dream.
>
> >> >> JBQ
>
> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> I've put together a hack that allows the system to compile and start
> >> >>> all the way to the home app. I worked with the delicateness of
> >> >>> open-heart surgery performed with a chainsaw.
>
> >> >>> Steps:
>
> >> >>> -remove the opencore files ( rm -rf external/opencore
> >> >>> .repo/projects/external/opencore.git ). Remove opencore from your
> >> >>> .repo/manifest.xml if you intend to repo sync the entire world but
> >> >>> don't want to have to remove opencore every single time.
>
> >> >>> -patch in change 9300 ( repo download platform/frameworks/base 9300/1 )
>
> >> >>> -most probably do a clean build ( rm -rf out/ ; make )
>
> >> >>> I've "tested" on a device/release/generic/userdebug build. On my
> >> >>> machine, it compiles, launches. The media process dies (which probably
> >> >>> means that downloads are busted too), as well as the music player. The
> >> >>> browser starts and can access the network.
>
> >> >>> JBQ
>
> >> >>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru 
> >> >>> <j...@android.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> I've submitted the merge (106 projects!), and I believe that the tree
> >> >>>> is in the state that it should be.
>
> >> >>>> Caveats:
>
> >> >>>> -THE BUILD IS BROKEN. You've been warned. There's been some drift
> >> >>>> around OpenCORE (probably situations where new code was written in
> >> >>>> cupcake that uses OpenCORE 1, or where APIs were removed in cupcake
> >> >>>> that OpenCORE 2 relies on).
>
> >> >>>> The proper command to try to merge the OpenCORE code should be "git
> >> >>>> merge remotes/korg/cupcake" (I'm typing from memory).
>
> >> >>>> -I'm not 100% sure that the server contains exactly what it should.
> >> >>>> I've had a filesystem failure right as I was trying to verify it, and
> >> >>>> I'm not gonna be able to verify until at least sometime tomorrow.
>
> >> >>>> JBQ
>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru 
> >> >>>> <j...@android.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>> I expect to start submitting the changes in about an hour, i.e.
> >> >>>>> between 1:30pm and 2pm PDT.
>
> >> >>>>> Starting right now, you may want to avoid initiating a new repo sync,
> >> >>>>> unless you're OK ending up with a tree that might not even compile.
>
> >> >>>>> JBQ
>
> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru 
> >> >>>>> <j...@android.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> [bcc android-platform, android-framework, android-porting]
>
> >> >>>>>> I'm working on merging the latest cupcake code drop into master. The
> >> >>>>>> task is quite hairy, so the following two guidelines probably apply:
>
> >> >>>>>> -please don't submit anything in gerrit, as you'll just get in my 
> >> >>>>>> way.
> >> >>>>>> -now is a good time to repo sync master, as I'm going to have to
> >> >>>>>> submit the result of the merge in a state where it doesn't build, 
> >> >>>>>> and
> >> >>>>>> I have no idea how long it'll take to get it to build again after
> >> >>>>>> that.
>
> >> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >> >>>>>> JBQ
>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >>>>>> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> >> >>>>>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >>>>>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no 
> >> >>>>>> further
> >> >>>>>> warning.
>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >>>>> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> >> >>>>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >>>>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no 
> >> >>>>> further
> >> >>>>> warning.
>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >>>> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> >> >>>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >>>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> >>>> warning.
>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >>> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> >> >>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> >>> warning.
>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> >> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> >> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> >> warning.
>
> >> > --
> >> > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> > Android Engineer, Google.
>
> >> > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> > warning.
>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> >> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> >> warning.
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
> Android Engineer, Google.
>
> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private
> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further
> warning.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"android-framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-framework@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
android-framework+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to