(I meant, I don't know) JBQ
2009/4/2 Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com>: > Sorry, I don't. > > JBQ > > 2009/4/2 luggie <lug...@gmail.com>: >> >> hi,JBQ,How do i make winows_sdk by this source code?(I had made sdk in >> ubuntu.) >> >> Thanks. >> >> On 4月2日, 下午4时16分, luggie <lug...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I create a android virtual device,and start emulator by "emulate -avd >>> <name>" >>> Thank you,JBQ! >>> >>> On 4月2日, 上午11时42分, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > I normally start it with just "emulator&". -avd is for future SDKs, >>> > you shouldn't need to specify it when working on your own builds >>> > (except if you're working on the SDK tools themselves). >>> >>> > JBQ >>> >>> > 2009/4/1 luggie <lug...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> > > hi, JBQ. >>> > > How do i start the emulator ? >>> > > What is "-avd"? >>> >>> > > Thank you! >>> >>> > > On 4月1日, 上午7时54分, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> > >> The changes are in, and master now builds with OpenCORE. >>> >>> > >> Thanks Ravi (and team) >>> >>> > >> JBQ >>> >>> > >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:22 PM, rktb <yend...@pv.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >> > I have fixed the master build to include OpenCORE now. The basic >>> > >> > functionality is up an running. There is still a known issue with the >>> > >> > "sdcard" not being detected as mentioned by JBQ above. >>> >>> > >> > The changes are in >>> > >> >https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,9446 >>> > >> >https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,9447 >>> > >> >https://review.source.android.com/Gerrit#change,9448 >>> >>> > >> > -Ravi >>> >>> > >> > On Mar 31, 10:15 am, rktb <yend...@pv.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> Thanks JBQ. Got around it. >>> >>> > >> >> -Ravi >>> >>> > >> >> On Mar 31, 4:55 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >> >> > Yes, I think it's broken, both on cupcake and master. My >>> > >> >> > understand is >>> > >> >> > that vold (the volume-management daemon, which replaced mountd) is >>> > >> >> > looking for a file that is not installed by the default >>> > >> >> > configuration. >>> >>> > >> >> > I've filedhttp://b.android.com/2335 >>> >>> > >> >> > JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:38 AM, rktb <yend...@pv.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >> >> > > Hi, >>> >>> > >> >> > > Is there an issue with the "sdcard" not being recognized on >>> > >> >> > > "master" >>> > >> >> > > latest? From the log also, I see the mediascanner service scan >>> > >> >> > > only >>> > >> >> > > the "internal" directory. I don't see the "external" directory. >>> >>> > >> >> > > yend...@yendurid630:~/oha_android$ grep MediaScanner >>> > >> >> > > /tmp/loge.txt >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:09.977 579 579 I ActivityManager: Start proc >>> > >> >> > > android.process.media for broadcast >>> > >> >> > > com.android.providers.media/.MediaScannerReceiver: pid=688 >>> > >> >> > > uid=10005 >>> > >> >> > > gids={1006, 2001, 3003} >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:12.226 688 697 D MediaScannerService: start >>> > >> >> > > scanning >>> > >> >> > > volume internal >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:03.726 688 697 D MediaScanner: opendir >>> > >> >> > > /system/media/ >>> > >> >> > > failed, errno: 2 >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:03.726 688 697 D MediaScanner: prescan time: >>> > >> >> > > 240ms >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:03.736 688 697 D MediaScanner: scan time: >>> > >> >> > > 44ms >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:03.746 688 697 D MediaScanner: postscan time: >>> > >> >> > > 1ms >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:03.756 688 697 D MediaScanner: total time: >>> > >> >> > > 285ms >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:03.786 688 697 D MediaScannerService: done >>> > >> >> > > scanning >>> > >> >> > > volume internal >>> > >> >> > > 03-31 03:12:03.796 579 583 I ActivityManager: Stopping >>> > >> >> > > service: >>> > >> >> > > com.android.providers.media/.MediaScannerService >>> >>> > >> >> > > -Ravi >>> >>> > >> >> > > On Mar 30, 5:26 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru <j...@android.com> >>> > >> >> > > wrote: >>> > >> >> > >> [still bcc android-platform, android-framework, >>> > >> >> > >> android-porting] >>> >>> > >> >> > >> Final status on this: >>> >>> > >> >> > >> -BUILD_WITHOUT_PV=true is now the default in master, so that a >>> > >> >> > >> plain >>> > >> >> > >> "make" should work again. This is still only a temporary hack >>> > >> >> > >> and >>> > >> >> > >> we'll have to fix this the right way in the future, but it'll >>> > >> >> > >> let >>> > >> >> > >> people build "out of the box". >>> >>> > >> >> > >> -Sorry for the delay in getting this done. Everything has been >>> > >> >> > >> hectic. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru >>> > >> >> > >> <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> > >> > [still bcc android-platform, android-framework, >>> > >> >> > >> > android-porting] >>> >>> > >> >> > >> > Latest status: >>> >>> > >> >> > >> > -we're back to one patch: 9356. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> > -build with "BUILD_WITHOUT_PV=true make" >>> >>> > >> >> > >> > -quickly tested both on emulator and dream, and seems to >>> > >> >> > >> > work well >>> > >> >> > >> > enough to not have the phone app crash in a loop. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> > -I expect to submit 9356 on Monday morning PDT. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> > JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru >>> > >> >> > >> > <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> > >> >> I've been working on a "better" batch of patches (now it >>> > >> >> > >> >> feels more >>> > >> >> > >> >> like open-heart surgery with a meat cleaver): >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >> -no need to delete the opencore directory or to remove it >>> > >> >> > >> >> from the manifest. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >> -you need to repo download changes 9355, 9356 and 9357. No >>> > >> >> > >> >> need to >>> > >> >> > >> >> take 9300. I know it's 3 changes instead of 1, because I >>> > >> >> > >> >> had to touch >>> > >> >> > >> >> a few more parts of the system, but those are much cleaner. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >> -only tested on the emulator, so those might very well cause >>> > >> >> > >> >> regressions on dream. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >> JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >> <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> > >> >>> I've put together a hack that allows the system to compile >>> > >> >> > >> >>> and start >>> > >> >> > >> >>> all the way to the home app. I worked with the >>> > >> >> > >> >>> delicateness of >>> > >> >> > >> >>> open-heart surgery performed with a chainsaw. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> Steps: >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> -remove the opencore files ( rm -rf external/opencore >>> > >> >> > >> >>> .repo/projects/external/opencore.git ). Remove opencore >>> > >> >> > >> >>> from your >>> > >> >> > >> >>> .repo/manifest.xml if you intend to repo sync the entire >>> > >> >> > >> >>> world but >>> > >> >> > >> >>> don't want to have to remove opencore every single time. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> -patch in change 9300 ( repo download >>> > >> >> > >> >>> platform/frameworks/base 9300/1 ) >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> -most probably do a clean build ( rm -rf out/ ; make ) >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> I've "tested" on a device/release/generic/userdebug build. >>> > >> >> > >> >>> On my >>> > >> >> > >> >>> machine, it compiles, launches. The media process dies >>> > >> >> > >> >>> (which probably >>> > >> >> > >> >>> means that downloads are busted too), as well as the music >>> > >> >> > >> >>> player. The >>> > >> >> > >> >>> browser starts and can access the network. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >>> <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> I've submitted the merge (106 projects!), and I believe >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> that the tree >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> is in the state that it should be. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> Caveats: >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> -THE BUILD IS BROKEN. You've been warned. There's been >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> some drift >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> around OpenCORE (probably situations where new code was >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> written in >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> cupcake that uses OpenCORE 1, or where APIs were removed >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> in cupcake >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> that OpenCORE 2 relies on). >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> The proper command to try to merge the OpenCORE code >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> should be "git >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> merge remotes/korg/cupcake" (I'm typing from memory). >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> -I'm not 100% sure that the server contains exactly what >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> it should. >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> I've had a filesystem failure right as I was trying to >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> verify it, and >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> I'm not gonna be able to verify until at least sometime >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> tomorrow. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> I expect to start submitting the changes in about an >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> hour, i.e. >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> between 1:30pm and 2pm PDT. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> Starting right now, you may want to avoid initiating a >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> new repo sync, >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> unless you're OK ending up with a tree that might not >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> even compile. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> <j...@android.com> wrote: >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> [bcc android-platform, android-framework, >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> android-porting] >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> I'm working on merging the latest cupcake code drop >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> into master. The >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> task is quite hairy, so the following two guidelines >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> probably apply: >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> -please don't submit anything in gerrit, as you'll just >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> get in my way. >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> -now is a good time to repo sync master, as I'm going >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> to have to >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> submit the result of the merge in a state where it >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> doesn't build, and >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> I have no idea how long it'll take to get it to build >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> again after >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> that. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> Thanks, >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> JBQ >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> -- >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> Android Engineer, Google. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> being private >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> with no further >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>>> warning. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> -- >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> Android Engineer, Google. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> being private >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> with no further >>> > >> >> > >> >>>>> warning. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> -- >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> Android Engineer, Google. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> being private >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> with no further >>> > >> >> > >> >>>> warning. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> -- >>> > >> >> > >> >>> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru >>> > >> >> > >> >>> Android Engineer, Google. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >>> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for >>> > >> >> > >> >>> being private >>> > >> >> > >> >>> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum >>> > >> >> > >> >>> with no further >>> > >> >> > >> >>> warning. >>> >>> > >> >> > >> >> -- >>> > >> >> > >> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru >>> >>> ... >>> >>> 阅读更多 >>- 隐藏被引用文字 - >>> >>> - 显示引用的文字 - >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > Android Engineer, Google. > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further > warning. > -- Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru Android Engineer, Google. Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further warning. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "android-framework" group. To post to this group, send email to android-framework@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-framework+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-framework?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
