Am Thursday 12 February 2009 16:14:39 schrieb Cédric Berger: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 16:04, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just as it is dual licensed (commercial / GPL), I think they can give > >> it as GPLv3. > >> Well technically they can, and seeing their license statement GPL3 > >> should be ok for them... > > > > Well, I think this is irrelevant as long as the header in the file > > explicitly states GPL version 2. > > Yes but for example if you had started with the commercial licensed > version (so header licence different), you could also just obtain the > GPL version instead (only license terms differ). > (And whatever patches you made yould apply to it the same way.). > > So what I mean is that if Qtextended (well nokia...) allows to get > source as GPLv3, then you can switch (as if you restart work from > another version). > (if additionnal patches are ok to convert to gpl3 of course)
Correct. Lets see when 4.5 comes out. -- :M: _______________________________________________ android-freerunner mailing list [email protected] http://android.koolu.org/listinfo.cgi/android-freerunner-koolu.org
