Hi Dianne, If we would like to provide the revision service to our customers, do we have to go through OHA? If not, would you mind pointing us where is the code to handle the OTA trigger from T-Mobile in G1 case?
Thanks, Zoneson On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Dianne Hackborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I'm sure there has, but that's probably not something most if any of us > here know about. If you are working on shipping a device, you should > probably get in contact through the OHA. > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Jay Freeman (saurik) <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> I am not saying that I want to install Google's existing OTA, T-Mobile >> signed updates on my device. I am saying that I am wondering how Google is >> intending to structure relationships to use their OTA infrastructure for >> other vendors. In essence I "want to work with Google to supply [my] own >> system images to [my] own phones through their update servers", and am >> wondering if there has been any thought put into that process on their side, >> past T-Mobile and the G1. -J >> >> *From:* Dianne Hackborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:10 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [android-porting] Re: enabling OTA updates for my device >> >> It probably doesn't even make sense to utilize the Google OTA server -- >> Google is supplying updates currently for the G1, which are a specific build >> configuration signed with certificates owned by the people who make that >> device (HTC and T-Mobile). You wouldn't want that OTAed on to a phone with >> your own build, because the certificates wouldn't match what is installed >> and all hell would break loose when it boots with the new certificates if >> you even hacked it to install the update at all. And even if you got that >> all to work, what you'd be receiving is the standard G1 build, losing >> whatever you have customized. >> >> I'm not sure what you are wanting to accomplish, but generally you would >> either want to work with Google to supply your own system images to your own >> phones through their update servers, or you can look at the code in the >> device for talking with those servers and implement your own; I don't think >> it is a super-complicated server protocol, though probably a little >> convoluted to follow. >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> >>> As I understand, the short answer is that right now "it's >>> Google-specific". >>> >>> I have a bit of second-hand knowledge about the update system, though >>> (since I do have some first-hand knowledge of code that it works >>> directly with). That still second-hand knowledge, though, so take it >>> with a grain of salt: >>> >>> -the first step is to determine that there's an update available. >>> That's the Google-specific part, and that's also the part that I'm the >>> least familiar with. The basic idea about how it's implemented right >>> now is that the device sends information about itself to an update >>> server (e.g. IMEI + current version) and the server responds whether >>> an update is available for that specific device, along with the URI >>> for that update. >>> >>> -the second step is to download the actual bits, typically into >>> /cache. Using the download manager is the recommended option here >>> (because it's been pretty well tested, and because it deals reasonably >>> well with managing space on /cache for that specific case), though I >>> guess that there are other options. >>> >>> -the third step is to reboot into recovery mode with the proper >>> information passed into the recovery code. I don't think that this >>> code is Google-specific, but it's not open-source and it might be >>> version-specific, so if you rebuild it by looking at the recovery code >>> you could end up with something that doesn't work on future versions. >>> I guess it'd be good if that could be covered by system class (to deal >>> with the compatibility issue), but it's not my decision to make (and I >>> guess it won't happen in the immediate future). >>> >>> -you can of course sprinkle just about any UI you want along the >>> various steps of the process. >>> >>> JBQ >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Jay Freeman (saurik) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> > So, let's say that I've succeeded in getting Android running on my >>> device. >>> > Is OTA updates from Google something that only really large-scale >>> providers >>> > like T-Mobile are going to be able to do? -J >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dianne Hackborn >> Android framework engineer >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to >> provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public >> forums, where I and others can see and answer them. >> >> >> > > > -- > Dianne Hackborn > Android framework engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public > forums, where I and others can see and answer them. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
