Hi Jean-Baptiste, Don't you think we could qualify this "non existing" feature as a bug ? It looks like you can connect to secured networks (EAP Enterprise, etc.) you think you are able to add a certificate but finally you can't.
Alex On Oct 30, 1:20 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no fundamental reason why such security features shouldn't be > included, and not having them indeed limits the out-of-the-box > usefulness of Android for corporate users. It all boils down to > resources and priorities, and if you'd like to contribute code toward > those features the best place to discuss your contributions is > actually the android-platform list. > > JBQ > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Chevalier Dev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The general silence around the lack of Android security features is > > deafening. The way it is currently going, it will end up with about a > > zillion proprietary keystores, protocols and crypto-based applications > > with no interoperability in sight. This is really unfortunate as an > > open-source OS has many more arguments towards security than a closed > > system. > > > Maybe I just missed something and Android has always been targetted at > > a general audience and not corporate users? > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Alex Danvy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I might have missed something but it looks like Android is not an > >> enterprise level phone yet. Security is a major concern for the > >> enterprise. > >> You have a nice browser, powerfull apps but can't connect to your > >> enterprise network to get data. > >> This is one of my main complaint about Android :http://bit.ly/Rx2bU. > > -- > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > Software Engineer, Android Open-Source Project, Google. > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further > warning.
