I'm sorry I misunderstood you on the possibility of contributions - I thought that's what you meant when you brought up the point that Android is Open-Source.
JBQ On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Chevalier Dev <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jean-Baptiste: > > I may be wrong but I believe there is currently a large number of > people paid to work on this platform. I am just pointing out that it > seems they left out an important aspect. Sending me to hell by telling > me to develop the OS myself may close this discussion but it is not > going to make things happen magically. > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There's no fundamental reason why such security features shouldn't be >> included, and not having them indeed limits the out-of-the-box >> usefulness of Android for corporate users. It all boils down to >> resources and priorities, and if you'd like to contribute code toward >> those features the best place to discuss your contributions is >> actually the android-platform list. > -- Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru Software Engineer, Android Open-Source Project, Google. Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further warning.
