Hey Tauren,

It's sounds correct to me.

I wonder though with the Virtual Machine if it has multiple holes that
could be found?

I think you are correct as far as the VM with the sandboxing is
concerned.

God Bless,
Eric

On Aug 27, 11:32 am, Tauren <[email protected]> wrote:
> So let me see if I understand this fully in regards to the android
> platform:
>
> Browser Level Sandboxing - this is part of the implementation of any
> application and will attempt to use code correctly while not
> implementing bugs, pwning this gives you access to the browsers
> permissions.
> Application level Sandboxing - this is an implementation within the
> virtual machine running everything and is an attempt to stop escapes
> from the applications sandbox, contains permissions, finding a bug
> gives you access to the virtual machine and extended permissions?
> Virtual Machine Level - Escaping this gives you access to the kernel
> Kernel level - Pwn?
>
> That sound correct?
>
> On Aug 27, 8:43 am, Eric Dorman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The SDK looks good and the documentation you guys have put out about
> > this really helps myself who just wants to really just tell you guys
> > of the possible bugs or holes I see in the software itself.
>
> > Anyways Thanks again Dianne!!! :D
>
> > God Bless & Thanks,
> > Eric
>
> > On Aug 27, 3:45 am, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Btw hopefully there's nothing too proprietary I need to worry about...
> > >  pretty much everything discussed on these groups is all in the open 
> > > source
> > > code, there is just a lot we haven't had time to really document about the
> > > implementation.  (Most of our effort is on the SDK level docs.)
>
> > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Dianne Hackborn 
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > Thanks, I'm glad I can help.
>
> > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Duane Blanchard 
> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > >> Yes, thank you very much, Dianne, for this explanation. You've made
> > > >> several great posts, and I just wanted to reinforce that we do all
> > > >> appreciate your sharing a little insider knowledge with us. I don't
> > > >> think you're sharing anything that is truly proprietary, but it all
> > > >> seems hard to come by without your help. So, thanks.
>
> > > >> D
>
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> "Android Security Discussions" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> [email protected].
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> [email protected]<android-security-disc
> > > >>  uss%[email protected]>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Dianne Hackborn
> > > > Android framework engineer
> > > > [email protected]
>
> > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> > > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
> > > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see 
> > > > and
> > > > answer them.
>
> > > --
> > > Dianne Hackborn
> > > Android framework engineer
> > > [email protected]
>
> > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
> > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see 
> > > and
> > > answer them.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Security Discussions" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to