On May 26, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Andreas Müller > <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On May 22, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Cliff Brake <cbr...@bec-systems.com> wrote: >>> >>>> there is a missing DEPENDS to gconf. After I built gconf, I get: >>>> >>>> https://gist.github.com/cbrake/5628386 >>>> >>> >>> >>> well I think this here >>> http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?revision=135388&view=revision >>> >> Thanks for the hint - I will look into that (am working on chrome >> anyway - for gcc 4.8 fix). >> >> Still I would like to have tests on my images with hardfp before >> applying - I don't want to open another WIP with unpredictable >> efforts. > > Please test out. > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/50553/ > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/50555/ > > I have compile tested the new chromium v29 recipe on hardfp/beaglebone/gcc-4.8 > > may be we should get rid of older chromium recipes in there but that can be > done once v29 works out ok. > > Let me know if you run into issues.
Andreas, Cliff Now that above patches are applied to meta-browser, can one of you test out the hardfp build on overo ? I don't have hardware myself to try it out. I would like to pull the above patch in question into angstrom. -Khem _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
