On May 28, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> 
wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On May 26, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Andreas Müller
>>> <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 22, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Cliff Brake <cbr...@bec-systems.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> there is a missing DEPENDS to gconf.  After I built gconf, I get:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/cbrake/5628386
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> well I think this here
>>>>> http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?revision=135388&view=revision
>>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the hint - I will look into that (am working on chrome
>>>> anyway - for gcc 4.8 fix).
>>>> 
>>>> Still I would like to have tests on my images with hardfp before
>>>> applying - I don't want to open another WIP with unpredictable
>>>> efforts.
>>> 
>>> Please test out.
>>> 
>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/50553/
>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/50555/
>>> 
>>> I have compile tested the new chromium v29 recipe on 
>>> hardfp/beaglebone/gcc-4.8
>>> 
>>> may be we should get rid of older chromium recipes in there but that can be
>>> done once v29 works out ok.
>>> 
>>> Let me know if you run into issues.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Andreas, Cliff
>> 
>> Now that above patches are applied to meta-browser, can one of you test out 
>> the hardfp build on overo ? I don't have hardware myself to try it out.
>> I would like to pull the above patch in question into angstrom.
>> 
> I have run tested most of my images with this patch applied - I don't
> see any issues. Especially chromium 29.x builds (also for gcc 4.8) and
> runs fine - thanks for taking care.
> 
> The only issue I see after this patch is broken TI's libgles. Since
> this is useless for many years anyway (just running demos at
> predefined size and 'mouse eating' is not what I expect when I ask for
> gles/egl support), we can take this patch in. I don't expect a working
> gles support from TI anyway.
> 

Thanks, patch is installed.


_______________________________________________
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel

Reply via email to