On May 28, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On May 26, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Andreas Müller >>> <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On May 22, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Cliff Brake <cbr...@bec-systems.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> there is a missing DEPENDS to gconf. After I built gconf, I get: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://gist.github.com/cbrake/5628386 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> well I think this here >>>>> http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?revision=135388&view=revision >>>>> >>>> Thanks for the hint - I will look into that (am working on chrome >>>> anyway - for gcc 4.8 fix). >>>> >>>> Still I would like to have tests on my images with hardfp before >>>> applying - I don't want to open another WIP with unpredictable >>>> efforts. >>> >>> Please test out. >>> >>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/50553/ >>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/50555/ >>> >>> I have compile tested the new chromium v29 recipe on >>> hardfp/beaglebone/gcc-4.8 >>> >>> may be we should get rid of older chromium recipes in there but that can be >>> done once v29 works out ok. >>> >>> Let me know if you run into issues. >> >> >> >> Andreas, Cliff >> >> Now that above patches are applied to meta-browser, can one of you test out >> the hardfp build on overo ? I don't have hardware myself to try it out. >> I would like to pull the above patch in question into angstrom. >> > I have run tested most of my images with this patch applied - I don't > see any issues. Especially chromium 29.x builds (also for gcc 4.8) and > runs fine - thanks for taking care. > > The only issue I see after this patch is broken TI's libgles. Since > this is useless for many years anyway (just running demos at > predefined size and 'mouse eating' is not what I expect when I ask for > gles/egl support), we can take this patch in. I don't expect a working > gles support from TI anyway. > Thanks, patch is installed. _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel