On Jun 28, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Charles Nicholson <charles.nichol...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First off, thanks a lot for the Angstrom effort, it's a great distro and
> we're committing to use it on BeagleBone Blacks to manage our automated
> test rack at work.
>
> We are trying to figure out the best way to capture a full Angstrom
> codebase snapshot so that we can iterate locally on it and make private
> changes. I see that invoking "bitbake virtual/kernel" performs an update
> before doing a build, so our current strategy is failing.
bitbake -cfetchall <yourimage>
will download the needed sources and then you can add BB_NO_NETWORK = "1"
to you local.conf from thereon it will not access web anymore
>
> My naive first attempt to capture Angstrom was to pull it down and do a
> full build as per the instructions on the Angstrom site. After confirming
> that this gave me a good output image, I deleted the entire /build
> directory, and then recursively deleted the .git metadata ("find . -type d
> -name ".git" -exec rm -rf {}\;"). I committed the results to our local
> private git repository.
>
> When our build slave machine tries to sync and build, it gives us this:
>
> MACHINE=beaglebone ./oebb.sh bitbake console-image
dont se oebb.sh wrapper to run builds once you have create the sandbox.
using oebb.sh config then
source ~/.oe/angstrom-* in your shell and after that issue normal bitbake
commands
directly
bitbake sytemd-image and so on
and once everything works for you. Contributions are welcome
> col: write error
> grotty:<standard input> (<standard input>):25092:fatal error: output error
> WARNING!!!!
> WARNING: bitbake is using a different uri
> 'g...@git.mycompany.com:hardware/bbb-angstrom.git' than configured in
> layers.txt 'git://github.com/openembedded/bitbake.git'
> WARNING: Changing uri to: 'git://github.com/openembedded/bitbake.git'
> WARNING!!!!
> Fetching origin
>
>
> This makes sense, because the conf/layers.txt file references all of
> the subprojects on the public github.
>
>
> Can I tell bitbake to use the local versions? Do I need to host each
> subproject on our internal git and point layers.txt towards that? Is
> what I'm doing sensible? :)
>
>
> All advice, comments, flames welcome, and thanks for taking the time
> to read this.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Charles Nicholson
> _______________________________________________
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
_______________________________________________
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
