On Monday 02 July 2007 19:56:41 Tim Chick wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 11:16, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:09:13AM +0100, Tim Chick wrote:
> > > Unfortunately because of the bugs in ffmpeg/avcodec, the iwmmxt
> > > extensions are not actually used. This has been fixed in ffmpeg/avcodec
> > > upstream, and I have some patches for openembedded to submit soon, and
> > > this speeds things up even more, but even with the one from the feed
> > > 320x240 full screen video is no problem.
> >
> > On that note, I was trying to bring mplayer_svn in line with the
> > versioned .bb file but I am hitting a bug where enabling iwmmxt is
> > enabling MMX which means native/RTjpegN.c fails trying to assemble x86
> > MMX instructions :-)
> >
> > Im sure there is an easy fix for this, but it is currently puzzling me,
> > dont suppose one of your patches fixes this?
>
> I think you need the arch to be "arm" int he configure script, not iwmmxt,
> then it figures  out itself to do iwmmxt if the compiler supports it and it
> is not disabled.
>
This it does, but it enables iwmmxt and x86 mmx the configure script seems
to be busted in this respect and I haven't had time to find the relevant 
fsckup.

> But my patch does not fix this, as I have just moved the arm improvements
> from ffmpeg svn, and put them in the mplayer rc code.
>
> How do I get bitbake to try and build the mplayer_svn.bb file?
>
bitbake -b ../org.openembedded.dev/packages/mplayer/mplayer_svn.bb

or a path something like that.

Graeme

_______________________________________________
Angstrom-distro-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users

Reply via email to