On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:52:34AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > or should i just ignore this and carry on?
> >
> This is a very wise option.
>
> The warning are generated when .bb files are parsed, once they are
> parsed and cached they are not parsed again which is why you dont
> see it on second run.
>
> The warning are only there to hint to people when they try and build
> bluez 3.X stuff and bitbake refuses to.
i understood that *general* principle, i just thought that only
those packages that corresponded to a particular target would have
their .bb files parsed. but it sounds like all of them are parsed the
very first time. is that what's happening? just trying to follow the
flow of logic here.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Angstrom-distro-users mailing list
Angstrom-distro-users@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users
