On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:32:52AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:52:34AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > or should i just ignore this and carry on? > > > > > This is a very wise option. > > > > The warning are generated when .bb files are parsed, once they are > > parsed and cached they are not parsed again which is why you dont > > see it on second run. > > > > The warning are only there to hint to people when they try and build > > bluez 3.X stuff and bitbake refuses to. > > i understood that *general* principle, i just thought that only > those packages that corresponded to a particular target would have > their .bb files parsed. but it sounds like all of them are parsed the > very first time. is that what's happening? just trying to follow the > flow of logic here. > Every .bb file not in BB_MASK is parsed.
Graeme _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-users mailing list Angstrom-distro-users@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users
