Hm… that begins to make sense! Thank you Sander!
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Sander Elias <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lloyd, Vlad, > > For using in the link or controller there isn't much difference. However, > if you need to do some logic in your compile, there is no scope in there! > You can use attr.$observe in places where the scope isn't there, or the > wrong scope. (you need to do something in the link function of an > transcluded replaced directive with an isolated scope!) > > Regards > Sander > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "AngularJS" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/angular/REBj8yEgRPc/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
