For using in the link or controller there isn't much difference. However, > if you need to do some logic in your compile, there is no scope in there! > You can use attr.$observe in places where the scope isn't there, or the > wrong scope. (you need to do something in the link function of an > transcluded replaced directive with an isolated scope!) >
Nice to know I didn't even think of it! So I get why and when we should use $observe instead of $watch. However, can this still called "the linking phase" as specified in the doc? How could we be more precise in it? Regards, LLoyd -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
