Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Oops, there was a prettifying bug in the previous version...
...
> OK, so now I'll make one with multiple steps [pause while I run my
> example generator and prettify the results]
1> A to B: [M_REQ_NEG, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 393]]]
2> B to A: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 56.0]]]
3> A to B: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 294.75]]]
4> B to A: [M_WAIT, 11146801, 20899]
5> B to A: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 84.0]]]
6> A to B: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 235.8]]]
7> B to A: [M_END, 11146801, [O_DECLINE, 'Insufficient funds']]
Lines 2 and 5 look identical to me.
As do lines 3 and 6.
> I use random numbers to generate the test cases. That was a nice one, it
> shows B telling A to wait and it shows a failed negotiation. But since
> A and B both know who they are, the fact that the session-id is identical
> isn't a problem.
Does it work only because line 4 precedes line 5?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
