Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On 21/10/2016 02:02, Michael Richardson wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> > Oops, there was a prettifying bug in the previous version...
    >>
    >> ...
    >>
    >> > OK, so now I'll make one with multiple steps [pause while I run my
    >> > example generator and prettify the results]

    1> A to B: [M_REQ_NEG, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 393]]]
    2> B to A: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 56.0]]]
    3> A to B: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 294.75]]]
    4> B to A: [M_WAIT, 11146801, 20899]
    5> B to A: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 84.0]]]
    6> A to B: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 235.8]]]
    7> B to A: [M_END, 11146801, [O_DECLINE, 'Insufficient funds']]

    >> Lines 2 and 5 look identical to me.

    > Yes, except that B increased its offer from $56 to $84.

    >> As do lines 3 and 6.

    > Yes, except that A reduced its request from $294 to $235

Ah, so this is one negotiation then?
I thought the M_WAIT was the end of a negotiation and 5> was a second thing,
but of course, that makes no sense, it would start with M_REQ_NEG.

    > There's a state machine at each end which is specific for this particular
    > objective. I'm a little confused about what's confusing you. (Maybe the
    > Appendix of examples needs explanatory text?)

Let me add some messages and interleave a second negotiation n2:

n1  1> A to B: [M_REQ_NEG, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 393]]]
n2 11> B to A: [M_REQ_NEG, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 392]]]

Yup, both ends picked the same session-id because cosmic ray hit, and started
negotiation.

n1  2> B to A: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 56.0]]]
n2 21> A to B: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 55.0]]]

n1  3> A to B: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 294.75]]]
n1  4> B to A: [M_WAIT, 11146801, 20899]
n2 31> B to A: [M_NEGOTIATE, 11146801, ['EX2', 1, 6, ['NZD', 292]]]

..

So, is message 31 (which looks the same as (5) above part of n1 or n2?



--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to