Hi, Michael, The information I got from netconf looks conflict. It seems Kent and you thought Netconf did not want this work and it is not a right home for it. But, Mehmet thought netconf was interested in this work and would like to have it in netconf. Personally, I support this work and think it should be done before or at least parallel with ANIMA bootstrap. I am fine to see it grow up in either Netconf or ANIMA.
Best regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: Anima [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael > Richardson > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 12:52 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Terry Manderson > Subject: [Anima] ownership vouchers (and git repo) > > > ANIMA Chairs, Terry, > > Do you think we have consensus that ownership vouchers belongs in ANIMA? > That seemed to be the result after many discussions at IETF97. > The feedback from NETCONF and 6tisch WG is that they don't seem to want it. > > At the anima-bootstrap design team meeting, we sorted out our github > permissions and which text was going into which document, etc. and in the > process it was pointed out that we didn't have all the repos into the same > "organization", and so we created an "anima-wg" org. > https://github.com/anima-wg > > Perhaps in-advance of actually asking the chairs about that, sorry. > May we be forgiven? We also forked all the repos we knew about into that > org. > > > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
