Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > The information I got from netconf looks conflict. It seems Kent and > you thought Netconf did not want this work and it is not a right home > for it. But, Mehmet thought netconf was interested in this work and > would like to have it in netconf. Personally, I support this work and > think it should be done before or at least parallel with ANIMA > bootstrap. I am fine to see it grow up in either Netconf or ANIMA.
I'm reporting a conversation that Kent and I had about the NETCONF WG meeting's reaction to adopting the work. So it's all heresay... Ultimately, it's an AD decision, and I'd like to hear from them, and get on with the actual work. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
