Hi all, When I discuss ACP with some product people, they are always curious about why we choose RPL for routing. I understand the benefits of RPL in ACP, it is lightweight and much more scalable in a single routing area, but most of the non-IoT network devices seem like lack the support of RPL.
So, please pardon my iteration on this problem, can we possibly make another more traditional IGP literally legal in the ACP document? (e.g. ISIS-autoconf or OSPFv3-autoconf) I know supporting multiple protocols would potentially cause interoperation issue. But in some closed solutions, multi-vendor interoperation is not the No.1 consideration for customers. If ACP allows ISIS-autoconf or OSPFv3-autoconf, I think ACP could be more widely adopted in non-IoT network devices. Any comments? Or eggs :) B.R. Bing _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
