Roberta Maglione (robmgl) <[email protected]> wrote: >> But in some closed solutions, multi-vendor interoperation is not the >> No.1 consideration for customers.
> If you think that multi-vendor interoperability is not needed what's
> the point of making a standard? Why discussing it here? You could make
> your own choice for protocol without asking for WG opinion/consensus.
Exactly, well said.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
