On 23/05/2017 13:25, Ben Campbell wrote: ... > - Is section 2 [Requirements] expected to be useful to implementers once this > is> published as an RFC? Unless there's a reason otherwise, I would suggest > moving this to an appendix, or even removing it entirely. As it is, you > have to wade through an unusual amount of front material before you get > to the meat of the protocol.
I'm open to that, and you are not the only reader with that comment. But we'd need WG consent... Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
