On 30/05/2017 06:51, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> -7, Grasp Message and Options table: Why "Standards Action"? Would you
> >> expect some harm to be done if this were only Spec Required?
>
> > Personal opinion: I see potential for harm. I could imagine that if
> > GRASP is a success, then with experience we might be more relaxed about
> > it, but for now I tend to be conservative about it. Of course, the WG
> > may disagree...
>
> Is it easier to raise the bar or lower it? I think lowering is easier.
> I could live with "Spec Required" or even FCFS for M_* values >65536, btw.
Probably, but it's definitely impossible to squeeze toothpaste back in the tube,
so IMHO lowering the bar later is the safer approach.
Brian
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
