On 24/05/2017 08:12, Deborah Brungard wrote:
...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The comparison text to routing protocols is outdated as ignores TE
> which can support any link/node attribute desired (bandwidth,
> availability, latency, etc.), discovery, bidirectional negotiation for
> use, and
> autoconfiguration (e.g. RFC 5340). When first discussing automatic
> networks, it may have been useful to compare with routing, as at a
> very high level view, it may look similar, but I think it is no longer
> relevant, and very confusing for a routing person. Suggest instead of a
> "I'm more complex than you" approach, remove these paragraphs.
> 
> A few minor edits will fix.
> 
> Suggest to remove the first paragraph of Section 2.2.  

I agree.

> Or edit:
> 1. links are no longer simple: "consider simple link"/s/"consider link"
> 2. Delete from "nodes need a consistent, although partial, view of the
> network topology in order for the routing algorithm to converge.  Also,
> routing is mainly based on simple information synchronization between
> peers, rather than on bi-directional negotiation." I think what you want
> to
> infer by "partial" is for a protocol instance/region. But there is
> support today
> for multi-layer and multi-region networks. And convergence scale is
> implementation. But none of this is relevant to anima so best is to
> delete vs.
> trying to fix.
> 
> Appendix E
> Remove the paragraph on routing or preface with "Early routing
> protocols.."

I agree.

> And the paragraph on RSVP is really not relevant for this comparison.

I think it is, because RSVP for IntServ really does negotiate a QoS spec
along the path.

> Unless
> want to edit, as RSVP-TE does do "discovery".

Not quite in the same sense, though. On balance it's a bit irrelevant
to the point.

Thanks!
   Brian
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to