Max, in section 3.3 we document the contents that the Registrar will POST to the MASA's /requestvoucher.
In section 3.4 we say: 3.4. Voucher Response ... If the the join operation is successful, the server response MUST contain an HTTP 200 response code. The server MUST answer with a suitable 4xx or 5xx HTTP [RFC2616] error code when a problem occurs. It seems that since we are using POST, that we ought to answer with an HTTP 201 response code, and include a Location: header at which the voucher could be accessed later on. I am not sure if I'm arguing for returning just the 201, and expect the Registrar to do a GET, although that would be more correct. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
