Max Pritikin (pritikin) <[email protected]> wrote: > From https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-9.5
> The action performed by the POST method might not result in a
> resource that can be identified by a URI. In this case, either 200
> (OK) or 204 (No Content) is the appropriate response status,
> depending on whether or not the response includes an entity that
> describes the result.
> In this case I think the 200 OK code is most appropriate since the
> server generates a signed voucher as a result of the POST and returns
> it. The voucher is not identified by a URI.
Agreed... let me ask the question again:
SHOULD the voucher be identified by a URI?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
