Toerless (the other working group chair) has been involved in conversations 
concerning the open issues listed on the github repository for the voucher 
document.
The issues should be resolved now as per the current status in github. See here 
for details of three open issues remaining:
https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues
The other issues have been resolved and the ‘top of the tree’ is here:
https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/blob/master/draft-ietf-anima-voucher.txt

If you are curious about what this resolves so far please look at these diffs 
(here summarized via the commit comments):

[some minor editorial work]
typo in "hangTex" instead of "hangText" 2f0d64c
updated hangtext for artifact definition 4f6c710
Updated the proximity description with minor editorial edits. … b742c5a
Merge branch 'master' into voucher_sync_061417 6cc9d72
manual merge of a generated txt file sucks. committing built version … …
[substantive issues]
additional enum for ‘proximity’ assertions:
https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/commit/b8ec4919242bc26c9082f633099656e4851097ea

addition of prior-signed-voucher to provide history in northbound BRSKI 
exchanges:
https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/commit/b742c5a63e05f1341b37f96009d6bfcd5f5be0e1

We believe this provides enough to proceed with LC and to allow BRSKI to be 
finalized toward LC as well asap.

- max

On Jun 26, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Sheng Jiang 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi, all

Given there is no negative response to the WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-voucher-03 
and we did receive good reviews through the WG document stage and considering 
the past history of this work, the ANIMA chairs feel it is has passed the WGLC 
and should advance. This conclusion is made with the condition that the authors 
would solve the comments received during the WGLC and these modifications were 
not substantial changes from 03 version. If there are big changes, a shorter 
second WGLC may be needed.

Once the update is published and it meets the above condition, for which the 
second WGLC is not needed, as shepherd, Sheng Jiang will finalize the shepherd 
document and send the document on.

Best regards,

Toerless & Sheng

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to