Which WG chair ? i am purely a co-author here on this thread ;-) Hope i just resolved to the approval of my co-authors two more, leaving just one open item which is how we best compromise between some fairly recent improvements to bootstrap (using voucher format also to request vouchers) and expediency in finishing last call for voucher.
Issues resolved: https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues/8 - how to use grouping in yang for extensibility via followup documents. Hope i didn't make mistakes in what i wrote, but the issue tracker URL now has a longer explanation from me how such extensibility can be done in the future and the necessary stub was added into the voucher draft (Kent had proposed this in the past already, i also verified this with some Yang knowledgable colleagues, so i hope we're good here). https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues/6 - describing how vouchers could be used with eg: JWS instead of PKCS#7 (via appropriate specs in other docs). Cheers Toerless On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:03:17PM +0000, Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote: > Toerless (the other working group chair) has been involved in conversations > concerning the open issues listed on the github repository for the voucher > document. > The issues should be resolved now as per the current status in github. See > here for details of three open issues remaining: > https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues > The other issues have been resolved and the ???top of the tree??? is here: > https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/blob/master/draft-ietf-anima-voucher.txt > > If you are curious about what this resolves so far please look at these diffs > (here summarized via the commit comments): > > [some minor editorial work] > typo in "hangTex" instead of "hangText" 2f0d64c > updated hangtext for artifact definition 4f6c710 > Updated the proximity description with minor editorial edits. ??? b742c5a > Merge branch 'master' into voucher_sync_061417 6cc9d72 > manual merge of a generated txt file sucks. committing built version ??? ??? > [substantive issues] > additional enum for ???proximity??? assertions: > https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/commit/b8ec4919242bc26c9082f633099656e4851097ea > > addition of prior-signed-voucher to provide history in northbound BRSKI > exchanges: > https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/commit/b742c5a63e05f1341b37f96009d6bfcd5f5be0e1 > > We believe this provides enough to proceed with LC and to allow BRSKI to be > finalized toward LC as well asap. > > - max > > On Jun 26, 2017, at 8:33 PM, Sheng Jiang > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, all > > Given there is no negative response to the WGLC on > draft-ietf-anima-voucher-03 and we did receive good reviews through the WG > document stage and considering the past history of this work, the ANIMA > chairs feel it is has passed the WGLC and should advance. This conclusion is > made with the condition that the authors would solve the comments received > during the WGLC and these modifications were not substantial changes from 03 > version. If there are big changes, a shorter second WGLC may be needed. > > Once the update is published and it meets the above condition, for which the > second WGLC is not needed, as shepherd, Sheng Jiang will finalize the > shepherd document and send the document on. > > Best regards, > > Toerless & Sheng > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > -- --- [email protected] _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
