As a reminder, we have two options in the draft for adding support of IPv4 prefix management:
1. Add a version number flag to the objective 2. Add a second objective specific to IPv4 So far the preferences I have heard (including my own) are for option 1, because it's simpler to implement. I think the authors will go that way for the next version, but of course it's a WG choice. Comments please! Quick link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-04#section-5.2 Regards Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
