Reaffirming my preference for 1. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:17:21PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > As a reminder, we have two options in the draft for adding support > of IPv4 prefix management: > > 1. Add a version number flag to the objective > 2. Add a second objective specific to IPv4 > > So far the preferences I have heard (including my own) are for option 1, > because it's simpler to implement. I think the authors will go that way for > the > next version, but of course it's a WG choice. Comments please! > > Quick link: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-04#section-5.2 > > Regards > Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
