Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:40:20AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: brian> Toerless explained elsewhere why he thinks the duplication is brian> needed. >> >> I read that after my email. >> I simply can't agree.
> I don't think i was suggesting duplication. I was suggesting for
> one document to define an extensibel objective and the other draft to
> extend it.
Objectives are so easy to define and require so little IANA coordination that
I don't see why we would want to extend it without also updating the BRSKI
document.
So to be clear: this is overly general, and I am opposed to this.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
