Dear All. It seems that we have the same "author information" as RFC 8321. I had understood reading a previous email that this was not possible. Thus, I suggest to maintain our current configuration (Michael as Editor and everybody else as authors) and wait for the IESG review. Best. Jéferson
Em ter, 30 de jan de 2018 às 22:29, Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> escreveu: > Brian: > > The commits do not show all contributions to text. > I often provided text in email to michael to merge in the past > when i didn't want to bother about github. But i am not insisting > on editor status, but as indicated only author status, and > for that the question of direct editing on github is irrelevant. > > I suggest we move everyone who explicitly wants to be > listed as contributor into that section, otherwise we keep > the list of authors (including Michael as only > editor) as it is right now and we will see what happens during > IESG review. > > There are also new RFCs coming out with 8 authors, eg: rfc8321. > > Cheers > Toerless > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:24:54AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > On 30/01/2018 09:00, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > > If its ok. with the other contributors, > > > i would appreciate if i could be listed as well as an editor. > > > > It's always a judgment call. Who's done most of the editing? > > Certainly Michael Behringer. > > (See https://github.com/mbehring/ANIMA-Reference-Model/commits/master) > > > > My view of this tricky topic: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-whats-an-author > > > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > Anima@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima >
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
