> On Mar 12, 2018, at 4:12 PM, Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Sheng,
> 
> Not that many actual new draft/work-items, but lots of activity going
> on, hee's what's on my contributor plate:
> 
> 1. draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control plane
>  5 min IESG review update
> 
> 2. draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd
>  <= 10 mins ?
>  Update of feedback from DNS-SD WG @ IETF100 (happened after ANIMA@IETF100)
>  and summary of implementation status from Brian.
>  Want to ask for ANIMA WG adoption (in-charter, details that fell off 
> BRSKI/ACP).
> 
> 3. I also have a personal problem, but maybe if Max chimes in and can help,
>  maybe this can also be a slot to discuss:
> 
>  I did contribute text about ANI/BRSKI to draft-nir-saag-star-01
>  (just check difference between the -00 version, eas to identify the ANI 
> text),
>  outlining how ANI itself can benefit from short-lived certificates, but
>  also how ANI could be a great infra to manage short-lived certificates.
> 
>  This was targeted for SAAG, but it ended up on tuesday, probably
>  9:50 - 10:10 time slot in SECDISPATCH.
> 
>  If Max could go to secdispatch, and represent BRSKI/EST/ANI,
>  that would be great, otherwise i would ask for 15 mins off from
>  anima for myself.

I can go to this (will be there in person). I’ll have to read the draft and 
coordinate with you on presentation talking-points,

- max

> 
>  Maybe we can have at the end of the anima schedule a short slot
>  to discuss possible extensions for short-lived certificates, e.g.:
>  what would need to be defined on a standards doc. And whether or not
>  this should be in ANIMA.
> 
> 4. I did not manage to finish a -00 draft, but would very much like to
>   find co-authors for a Yang model for ANI, so if there is anyone here
>   interredsted in this, pls. ping me offline.
> 
> 5. Alas, probably no RFC for ANIMA to report until IETF101. 
>   draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity would have no dependencies to wait
>   for, but its in RFC editor queue for 4 weeks, without feedback yet.
>   As far as i was told, this is unfortunately normal before the spring meeting
>   with all the leaving ADs prioritizing the stuff they wanted to get finished
>   in the RFC editor queue, so wait time for RFC editor resources in this
>   time slot is particularily long. (Voucher might be further along, but
>   would have BRSKI dependency to wait for).
> 
> Cheers
>    Toerless
> 
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:56:34AM +0000, Sheng Jiang wrote:
>> Hi, all anima,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We have been allocated a session of 2.5-hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for 
>> IETF-101 (London) and are starting to collect agenda items for the session. 
>> Please send your request for agenda by March 8th, Thursday.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Giving that most of our chartered work items have been sent to IESG for 
>> publication by the meeting, we expect short time slots for only two or three 
>> of them. For this coming meeting, we would like to discuss potential future 
>> ANIMA works.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> As normal, the priority among these non-charter work items would be: these 
>> that have active discussion in mail list, then these have submitted drafts, 
>> and topics without drafts.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please send us (anima-chairs at 
>> ietf.org<https://ietf.org/><http://ietf.org%3Chttps/ietf.org/%3E)>;) 
>> requests for time slot by March 8th, Thursday and include:
>> 
>> Name of time slot:
>> 
>> Name of draft(s):
>> 
>> Time requested:
>> 
>> Presenter name(s):
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> More details about the IETF 101, London can be found at:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/101/index.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Again, presenters and draft authors please invoke active discussions in the 
>> ANIMA list. Mail list is a very good place to discuss and reach consensus on 
>> technical issues.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Toerless & Sheng
>> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anima mailing list
>> Anima@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> t...@cs.fau.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to