Thanks, Max. We'll coordinate. The presentation at secdispatch will be given by Nir, but i'd hope you can be on stage for the Q&A, especially re either ANI/BRSKI or the logic of split horizon for the interpretation of the short lived cert - use by apps vs. use by renewal procedures. Thats i think the core.
And we should then ask for a 5 min slot at end of anima, so maybe you can report back from secdispatch. Cheers Toerless On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:21:28PM +0000, Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote: > > > > On Mar 12, 2018, at 4:12 PM, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Sheng, > > > > Not that many actual new draft/work-items, but lots of activity going > > on, hee's what's on my contributor plate: > > > > 1. draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control plane > > 5 min IESG review update > > > > 2. draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd > > <= 10 mins ? > > Update of feedback from DNS-SD WG @ IETF100 (happened after ANIMA@IETF100) > > and summary of implementation status from Brian. > > Want to ask for ANIMA WG adoption (in-charter, details that fell off > > BRSKI/ACP). > > > > 3. I also have a personal problem, but maybe if Max chimes in and can help, > > maybe this can also be a slot to discuss: > > > > I did contribute text about ANI/BRSKI to draft-nir-saag-star-01 > > (just check difference between the -00 version, eas to identify the ANI > > text), > > outlining how ANI itself can benefit from short-lived certificates, but > > also how ANI could be a great infra to manage short-lived certificates. > > > > This was targeted for SAAG, but it ended up on tuesday, probably > > 9:50 - 10:10 time slot in SECDISPATCH. > > > > If Max could go to secdispatch, and represent BRSKI/EST/ANI, > > that would be great, otherwise i would ask for 15 mins off from > > anima for myself. > > I can go to this (will be there in person). I???ll have to read the draft and > coordinate with you on presentation talking-points, > > - max > > > > > Maybe we can have at the end of the anima schedule a short slot > > to discuss possible extensions for short-lived certificates, e.g.: > > what would need to be defined on a standards doc. And whether or not > > this should be in ANIMA. > > > > 4. I did not manage to finish a -00 draft, but would very much like to > > find co-authors for a Yang model for ANI, so if there is anyone here > > interredsted in this, pls. ping me offline. > > > > 5. Alas, probably no RFC for ANIMA to report until IETF101. > > draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity would have no dependencies to wait > > for, but its in RFC editor queue for 4 weeks, without feedback yet. > > As far as i was told, this is unfortunately normal before the spring > > meeting > > with all the leaving ADs prioritizing the stuff they wanted to get > > finished > > in the RFC editor queue, so wait time for RFC editor resources in this > > time slot is particularily long. (Voucher might be further along, but > > would have BRSKI dependency to wait for). > > > > Cheers > > Toerless > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:56:34AM +0000, Sheng Jiang wrote: > >> Hi, all anima, > >> > >> > >> > >> We have been allocated a session of 2.5-hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for > >> IETF-101 (London) and are starting to collect agenda items for the > >> session. Please send your request for agenda by March 8th, Thursday. > >> > >> > >> > >> Giving that most of our chartered work items have been sent to IESG for > >> publication by the meeting, we expect short time slots for only two or > >> three of them. For this coming meeting, we would like to discuss potential > >> future ANIMA works. > >> > >> > >> > >> As normal, the priority among these non-charter work items would be: these > >> that have active discussion in mail list, then these have submitted > >> drafts, and topics without drafts. > >> > >> > >> > >> Please send us (anima-chairs at > >> ietf.org<https://ietf.org/><http://ietf.org%3Chttps/ietf.org/%3E)>;) > >> requests for time slot by March 8th, Thursday and include: > >> > >> Name of time slot: > >> > >> Name of draft(s): > >> > >> Time requested: > >> > >> Presenter name(s): > >> > >> > >> > >> More details about the IETF 101, London can be found at: > >> > >> > >> > >> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/101/index.html > >> > >> > >> > >> Again, presenters and draft authors please invoke active discussions in > >> the ANIMA list. Mail list is a very good place to discuss and reach > >> consensus on technical issues. > >> > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Toerless & Sheng > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Anima mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > > > > > > -- > > --- > > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Anima mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > -- --- [email protected] _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
