Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed not. My suggestion creates no new protocol and doesn't change anything > for the registrar, proxy, and pledge. It recycles the registrar-MASA protocol > as the registrar-OASA protocol. And presumably it also recycles the registrar-MASA > protocol as the OASA-MASA protocol, when the OASA needs to get a new nonceless > voucher for a newly purchased pledge. I think there's a very modest amount > of "new".
I think that "My suggestion" refers to the OASA concept? I believe that it creates new protocol in the form of extensions to 8366 processing. I think it also requires the Registrar to contact the OASA (overriding the MASA URL in the IDevID), but maybe you have another idea. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
