Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Indeed not. My suggestion creates no new protocol and doesn't change
anything
> for the registrar, proxy, and pledge. It recycles the registrar-MASA
protocol
> as the registrar-OASA protocol. And presumably it also recycles the
registrar-MASA
> protocol as the OASA-MASA protocol, when the OASA needs to get a new
nonceless
> voucher for a newly purchased pledge. I think there's a very modest amount
> of "new".I think that "My suggestion" refers to the OASA concept? I believe that it creates new protocol in the form of extensions to 8366 processing. I think it also requires the Registrar to contact the OASA (overriding the MASA URL in the IDevID), but maybe you have another idea. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
