On 2018-12-03 06:44, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Indeed not. My suggestion creates no new protocol and doesn't change
> anything
> > for the registrar, proxy, and pledge. It recycles the registrar-MASA
> protocol
> > as the registrar-OASA protocol. And presumably it also recycles the
> registrar-MASA
> > protocol as the OASA-MASA protocol, when the OASA needs to get a new
> nonceless
> > voucher for a newly purchased pledge. I think there's a very modest
> amount
> > of "new".
>
> I think that "My suggestion" refers to the OASA concept?
>
> I believe that it creates new protocol in the form of extensions to 8366
> processing.
Possibly. I haven't gone into the details.
> I think it also requires the Registrar to contact the OASA
> (overriding the MASA URL in the IDevID), but maybe you have another idea.
No, exactly that.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
