On 2018-12-03 06:44, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Indeed not. My suggestion creates no new protocol and doesn't change > anything > > for the registrar, proxy, and pledge. It recycles the registrar-MASA > protocol > > as the registrar-OASA protocol. And presumably it also recycles the > registrar-MASA > > protocol as the OASA-MASA protocol, when the OASA needs to get a new > nonceless > > voucher for a newly purchased pledge. I think there's a very modest > amount > > of "new". > > I think that "My suggestion" refers to the OASA concept? > > I believe that it creates new protocol in the form of extensions to 8366 > processing.
Possibly. I haven't gone into the details. > I think it also requires the Registrar to contact the OASA > (overriding the MASA URL in the IDevID), but maybe you have another idea. No, exactly that. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima