Ted Hardie <ted.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Howdy,

    > I would personally not suggest using IRIs here, given that the scheme
    > (https) is expected to retrieve a resource at a well-known location and
    > thus will always have to be mapped to a URI to do the retrieval (rather
    > than used in a string comparison or something similar) .  RFC 5280,
    > which this cites, actually goes through the steps pretty well, and I
    > think the complexity there demonstrates the advantage for constrained
    > devices of always using the URI form.

I have changed the references from IRI to URL, and the components from
iauthority to 'authority'.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     m...@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to