Folks,
My perspective matches what Russ & Ben have suggested, i.e., use of
rfc822Name is inappropriate for this context. RFC 5280 is very clear
about the intended use of the rfc822Name field in a cert and the
proposed use in the anima context is inconsistent with 5280 text. A
reasonable, appropriate way forward is to define a new otherName type
for the anima context.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
