This matches my understanding as well. One thing that's not clear to me: is the expectation that you will be using a public CA or that you will be using an enterprise-level one?
-Ekr On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:03 PM Stephen Kent <stkent= [email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > My perspective matches what Russ & Ben have suggested, i.e., use of > rfc822Name is inappropriate for this context. RFC 5280 is very clear > about the intended use of the rfc822Name field in a cert and the proposed > use in the anima context is inconsistent with 5280 text. A reasonable, > appropriate way forward is to define a new otherName type for the anima > context. > > Steve > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima >
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
